One reads here and there that the headscarf sexualize the woman. This is true in my opinion not. Sexualization is the wrong term.
The woman is not made so sexual, so we need it to be considered only once, especially in the extreme form of burqa. The woman is rather marked, it becomes the selected object in a vorzivilisatorischen possessiveness.
- headscarf with the woman is labeled as a possession of a man or clan. The headscarf indicates that the property is to defend, by all means. The fact that she was wearing a headscarf decent and good, is a secondary feature: Decent just means that it has accepted its existence as property.
- heard the woman without a headscarf anyone, so it can be seized by each man and used. She is fair game, belongs to no one, and is without protection of the clan, a man. Secondarily, it follows that she is a bitch. Will take a wife from their own property, the headscarf, then she wants to make the bitch. It can therefore be captured by any means and punished.
Those who advocate the headscarf, which also supports the view that a man work like this:
- Does the man is a woman with a headscarf, then he accepts that it is marked as the property of others and therefore taboo. Who diee taboo and not accepted for Bespile the woman asks for the time that violates the property rights of a man / clans and therefore can be punished for it, with all possible means.
- Does the man is a woman without a headscarf, then he sees a piece of abandoned property . He may be appropriated and any use, since the play by anyone else is claimed. It can not be otherwise, because he to the appeal of the piece of meat is defenseless. Does the woman voluntarily not wear a headscarf, then that is the prompt to use. Because they are specifically asking anyone, but generally the men, she is a stray whore.
The headscarf marks the ownership of the thing about women and therefore works as a stigma on a cattle.
The mark does not fit into a society that sees women as a distinct people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment